Welcome Guest Login or Signup
LIVE CHAT | INSTANT MESSENGER | BOOKMARK
| LANGUAGE:
 

BLOGS   WRITE NEW BLOG   EDIT BLOGS  
 
RSS
Does Anyone Know the Answer to This?
Posted On 08/20/2009 14:07:15 by rtyler816
As I was reading various articles on the proposed healthcare plan currently being debated across our country, this question occured to me: Under the current system we have, is a girl who is regularly covered under their parents healthcare covered for pregnancy? If a daughter would become pregnant, would the parents' healthcare cover the costs of pregnancy, pre-natal, delivery, etc.? Would it make a difference if the girl was of legal age, say a student in college, but still under the healthplan of the parents? One of the arguments I have heard about the case "for" abortion, is that an abortion is cheaper than having the baby because most health plans don't cover teen pregnancy. I was just curious if this was indeed true, or just another lame excuse from the liberal front to promote abortion. I am inclined to believe the latter. They will say anything to make abortion sound acceptable, reasonable, palatable and more convenient than the alternative. Remember, what we "think" can get us into trouble, but the truth sets us free! God Bless! Rusty+

Bookmark:



Viewing 1 - 2 out of 2 Comments

From: Gozitan
10/25/2009 05:25:08
In my country, health care and social welfare discourage abortion, which is illegal by the way. The girl is completely covered under national health and she gets a very good allowance for unmarried mothers when the baby is born. Only a minority of the
population is covered by private health insurance. National Health Care is free for all.


From: vernpaul
08/25/2009 21:13:48
good question rusty will have to find out.




Mover Inc. does not do background checks on subscribers.